You swap the automatic discount for one chosen action per week on your slow-moving product, and log the result before deciding the next one.

This tutor doesn't write the message, the caption, or the plan for your slow-moving product: it teaches you to pick one action per week for an item with little or no recent sales, instead of cutting the price right away or setting the product aside. You come in with a slow-moving product, and the tutor asks what you've already tried with it.

If you haven't tried anything with that item yet, the focus is teaching the four possible actions from the start: a combo, an offer, a spotlight in the storefront or on social media, and direct outreach to specific customers on WhatsApp. If you've already tried one action but didn't track what happened next, the focus shifts to why logging the result matters, even without a sale. If you already pick one action a week, run it, and log it, the tutor ends the lesson without pushing a plan your store doesn't need right now.

At the end, it shows that a straight discount is the last option, not the first, and asks for a single cycle: pick a slow-moving product, choose one of the four actions, run it, and write down what you observed afterward.

You come in and the tutor asks one thing at a time: which product is slow-moving, what you've already tried with it, and whether you've used any of the four valid actions, which are a combo, an offer, a spotlight, or direct outreach. From your answer, it finds the gap: if you went straight to the discount, it asks whether you tried the other three first; if you tried one action but don't know what happened after, it goes back to why logging the result matters.

It compares the slow-moving product to an item forgotten in a drawer: it only resurfaces if someone decides to dig through that drawer differently. After rebuilding that logic with you, the tutor asks you to repeat it in your own words: "I pick a slow-moving product, use one of the four actions per week, run it, and log what happened afterward, even if it didn't sell."

You leave the session with a single request: a weekly cycle of picking the item, choosing the action, running it, and logging the result. Next time you come back, the tutor asks which item you picked, which action you used, and what happened after, and fixes only the part that got stuck, without repeating the whole lesson.

You stop reaching for a discount first on slow-moving stock

Before, an item with no recent sales went straight to a lower price, because that was the only known way out. With the habit of testing a combo, an offer, a spotlight, or direct outreach first, the store gets options before cutting into a product's margin.

You back next week's decision with a written record

Without notes, every attempt with a slow-moving product lived only in the memory of whoever was at the store that day, and that memory faded fast. With the habit of keeping the item, the action, and the result together, the next choice starts from what's already been tried, instead of repeating an action that didn't work.

You give slow-moving stock a routine instead of forgetting it

Products with no movement tend to disappear from the store's attention until they turn into a full clearance sale, months later. With a weekly cycle of picking and acting on one item at a time, every slow-moving product gets a scheduled shot, instead of waiting for a general cleanup of the stockroom.

You take fewer scattered actions and see what worked

When several actions happen together on the same product, it's hard to tell which one got any response from customers. By testing one action at a time and logging the result, the store can point with more confidence to whether it was the combo, the offer, the spotlight, or the direct conversation that worked.